Quote:
Originally Posted by nedry
Interesting that so many recent prerelease sets which should be in the 23900's range are getting entered as 22900's. Their registrar/data person's dyslexia must be acting up again... it's getting to a point where you need an Excel spreadsheet to keep track of all the double- and triple-booked set numbers.
Not anything we can do to fix it, but just noting it's something to watch out for... I'm a researcher and archivist myself and this kind of thing sends my autism-fueled Professional Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder into acute attacks that could easily be mistaken for Tourette's.
|
This is not an OAS issue, they have changed the numbering system like two years ago. I don't know how/where Cameron takes the numbering, that is likely to follow the old OAS system, but ... well, there's some failing to it too, lol.